Top Menu

Wolff: No more delays on A’s ballpark decision

Proposed San Jose ballpark

With reports that Bud Selig is mulling a Oakland A’s ballpark decision that could end up taking a year or more to settle, owner Lew Wolff says more delays will only end up killing a San Jose ballpark project.

Selig is reportedly looking at a plan that would require both the A’s and the San Francisco Giants, who oppose a new ballpark in San Jose, to meet certain conditions in order to prevail in the territorial battle. The actual conditions at this time are a little fuzzy, reports the Los Angeles Times, but the whole process will have one tangible result: it will delay any final decision by at least a year. And that will end up killing the deal, according to Wolff:

“That would be a no,” Wolff said. “They might as well just tell us no.”

For Selig, there’s really no great solution. Approving the ballpark would be a boost to the A’s and take one low-income team off the revenue-sharing rolls, but it also tramples on the Giants’ territorial rights — and many large-market teams are very committed to MLB’s territorial-rights system. Denying permission pretty much consigns the A’s to either staying in Oakland — where there indeed are efforts on a new ballpark — or moving out of the area, probably under new ownership. On the flip side, it’s not as though the San Jose ballpark plan is shovel-ready, as the state looks at whether the city inappropriately shielded the land from a state takeover of city and county redevelopment agencies.

In any case, we could see some movement on the Oakland/San Francisco impasse by the end of the year.

RELATED STORIES: San Jose ballpark land deal under formal review; Could Giants-A’s battle be settled in court?Waterfront site emerging as new A’s homeMLB committee meets with Oakland, San Jose officials about future of A’s;Developer: I can build new A’s ballpark with private financingSan Jose: A’s ballpark land safe — for nowWolff meets with Knauss, has clear message: A’s not for saleGiants: Nothing would tempt us to give up Silicon Valley territorySelig: A’s can leave Oakland — just not for San JoseCal to San Jose: Slow down on new ballparkA’s expected to push for ballpark decision at owner’s meetingsToday’s A’s/Giants update: nothing newWolff: A’s aren’t for saleSuitors emerge for Oakland AthleticsTurf wars rage again in Bay Area: A’s say San Jose move doesn’t infringe on GiantsOakland: One last gasp at keeping A’sMLB: No, there’s been no decision on Oakland A’s to San JoseOakland bows out of Victory Court site for new A’s ballparkCourt ruling clarifies San Jose, Escondido ballpark statusesSan Jose to sell A’s ballpark land at huge lossOakland player plan depends on new ballparkObstacles to new ballparks in California: not as bleak as expectedSan Jose rushing to acquire land for Athletics ballparkCould Oakland bar A’s from moving?Cal budget issues could alter San Jose, Oakland plans for A’s ballparkBeware folks peddling simple solutions to complex problemsOakland moves forward on environmental study of A’s ballpark siteOakland may be in better financial shape to host new A’s ballparkOakland pitches new waterfront site for new A’s ballparkAs Giants win World Series, Athletics ballpark status in limbo


Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at

Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.

Join Ballpark Digest on Facebook and on Twitter!

Follow Ballpark Digest on Google + and add us to your circles!

, , , , , , ,