With reports that Bud Selig is mulling a Oakland A’s ballpark decision that could end up taking a year or more to settle, owner Lew Wolff says more delays will only end up killing a San Jose ballpark project.
Selig is reportedly looking at a plan that would require both the A’s and the San Francisco Giants, who oppose a new ballpark in San Jose, to meet certain conditions in order to prevail in the territorial battle. The actual conditions at this time are a little fuzzy, reports the Los Angeles Times, but the whole process will have one tangible result: it will delay any final decision by at least a year. And that will end up killing the deal, according to Wolff:
“That would be a no,” Wolff said. “They might as well just tell us no.”
For Selig, there’s really no great solution. Approving the ballpark would be a boost to the A’s and take one low-income team off the revenue-sharing rolls, but it also tramples on the Giants’ territorial rights — and many large-market teams are very committed to MLB’s territorial-rights system. Denying permission pretty much consigns the A’s to either staying in Oakland — where there indeed are efforts on a new ballpark — or moving out of the area, probably under new ownership. On the flip side, it’s not as though the San Jose ballpark plan is shovel-ready, as the state looks at whether the city inappropriately shielded the land from a state takeover of city and county redevelopment agencies.
In any case, we could see some movement on the Oakland/San Francisco impasse by the end of the year.
RELATED STORIES: San Jose ballpark land deal under formal review; Could Giants-A’s battle be settled in court?; Waterfront site emerging as new A’s home; MLB committee meets with Oakland, San Jose officials about future of A’s;Developer: I can build new A’s ballpark with private financing; San Jose: A’s ballpark land safe — for now; Wolff meets with Knauss, has clear message: A’s not for sale; Giants: Nothing would tempt us to give up Silicon Valley territory; Selig: A’s can leave Oakland — just not for San Jose; Cal to San Jose: Slow down on new ballpark; A’s expected to push for ballpark decision at owner’s meetings; Today’s A’s/Giants update: nothing new; Wolff: A’s aren’t for sale; Suitors emerge for Oakland Athletics; Turf wars rage again in Bay Area: A’s say San Jose move doesn’t infringe on Giants; Oakland: One last gasp at keeping A’s; MLB: No, there’s been no decision on Oakland A’s to San Jose; Oakland bows out of Victory Court site for new A’s ballpark; Court ruling clarifies San Jose, Escondido ballpark statuses; San Jose to sell A’s ballpark land at huge loss; Oakland player plan depends on new ballpark; Obstacles to new ballparks in California: not as bleak as expected; San Jose rushing to acquire land for Athletics ballpark; Could Oakland bar A’s from moving?; Cal budget issues could alter San Jose, Oakland plans for A’s ballpark; Beware folks peddling simple solutions to complex problems; Oakland moves forward on environmental study of A’s ballpark site; Oakland may be in better financial shape to host new A’s ballpark; Oakland pitches new waterfront site for new A’s ballpark; As Giants win World Series, Athletics ballpark status in limbo
Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.
Join Ballpark Digest on Facebook and on Twitter!
Follow Ballpark Digest on Google + and add us to your circles!