Top Menu

Could Giants-A’s battle be settled in court?

San Francisco GiantsThough owners pledge not to sue Major League Baseball when they purchase a team, that’s not stopping plenty of lawyers from closely observing the battle between the San Francisco Giants and Oakland A’s over San Jose.

The spectre of a lawsuit from either party has surely been a concern to MLB Commissioner Bud Selig as he maneuvers MLB through some pretty nasty hurdles. On the one hand, the Giants generate a quarter of their revenue from Silicon Valley businesses and fans, so you can see why ownership would be hesitant about allowing an A’s move there. On the other hand, A’s owner Lew Wolff knows San Jose well and rightly sees it as the answer to his team’s financial needs. But Wolff put Selig in a bad situation by announcing his intent to build a San Jose ballpark before seeking a consensus on the issue from MLB owners, and he’s paid the price — as Selig and his committee have patiently waited for the storm to pass.

But it hasn’t. So now we’re in a situation that could get even uglier, with lawyers potentially ready to pounce no matter what Selig does, according to Steve Henson at Yahoo News. It is a problem that simply won’t go away. Selig has been pretty consistent about his guiding principles regarding franchise movement — if an existing city can show it’s serious about a ballpark solution, the team won’t be moved.

In any case, we don’t see 75 percent of MLB owners agreeing to a move of the A’s — if the numbers were there, Selig would have probably already called a vote. Do the math: if the commissioner is allowed to disregard territorial rights here, what’s to stop him from allowing the Tampa Bay Rays to move to New Jersey or Connecticut? Or stop the Cleveland Indians from moving to Boston or Philadelphia? Or stop the next A’s owner from moving the team to downtown Los Angeles? Every big-market team relies on MLB territorial rules to maintain local monopolies. The current territorial setup has worked well for Major League Baseball, and you can bet that no one in the Yankees, Mets, Red Sox or Phillies front offices want to see it go.

RELATED STORIES: Waterfront site emerging as new A’s homeDeveloper: I can build new A’s ballpark with private financingSan Jose: A’s ballpark land safe — for nowWolff meets with Knauss, has clear message: A’s not for saleGiants: Nothing would tempt us to give up Silicon Valley territorySelig: A’s can leave Oakland — just not for San JoseCal to San Jose: Slow down on new ballparkA’s expected to push for ballpark decision at owner’s meetingsToday’s A’s/Giants update: nothing newWolff: A’s aren’t for saleSuitors emerge for Oakland AthleticsTurf wars rage again in Bay Area: A’s say San Jose move doesn’t infringe on GiantsOakland: One last gasp at keeping A’sMLB: No, there’s been no decision on Oakland A’s to San JoseOakland bows out of Victory Court site for new A’s ballparkCourt ruling clarifies San Jose, Escondido ballpark statusesSan Jose to sell A’s ballpark land at huge lossOakland player plan depends on new ballparkObstacles to new ballparks in California: not as bleak as expectedSan Jose rushing to acquire land for Athletics ballparkCould Oakland bar A’s from moving?Cal budget issues could alter San Jose, Oakland plans for A’s ballparkBeware folks peddling simple solutions to complex problemsOakland moves forward on environmental study of A’s ballpark siteOakland may be in better financial shape to host new A’s ballparkOakland pitches new waterfront site for new A’s ballparkAs Giants win World Series, Athletics ballpark status in limbo


Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at

Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.

Join Ballpark Digest on Facebook and on Twitter!

Follow Ballpark Digest on Google + and add us to your circles!

, , , , , , ,