Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred is displeased by Oakland‘s lawsuit over a potential sale of Coliseum land to the Oakland A’s, making his concerns know to city officials.
On Friday of last week, the City of Oakland filed a lawsuit against Alameda County over its previous decision to move forward with selling its 50% share of the 155-acre Coliseum site to the A’s for $85 million. While the sale has not been finalized, the county’s action was viewed as a boost to the A’s, who have proposed building a new ballpark at the waterfront Howard Terminal site while also taking on a separate redevelopment of the RingCentral Coliseum site and surrounding property.
The lawsuit came just days before the A’s hosted the Tampa Bay Rays in the American League Wild Card game on Wednesday. While in Oakland for the game, Manfred indicated that he was upset with the city’s action to sue the county and called on city officials to start making progress with the A’s long-running ballpark search. More from the San Francisco Chronicle:
“I’m very concerned about the developments of the last couple of days,” Manfred said. “I think (A’s President) Dave Kaval and John Fisher and the rest of the A’s organization have made a huge investment to try to get a stadium done here, and to have a city entity turn around and litigate against progress is upsetting.”
Manfred met with Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf — who has been behind the A’s efforts to build a stadium at Howard Terminal — and City Council President Rebecca Kaplan earlier in the day.
“I made it clear that it’s time for the city of Oakland to show concrete progress on the stadium effort,” Manfred said. “It’s gone on too long, and things need to fall into place to get a new stadium here. The fans here, as demonstrated by the 55,000 here tonight, are great fans and deserve a major-league-quality facility.”…
“I said to the mayor at one point, ‘The timing was such that some people could read it that maybe it is time for us to consider other alternatives,’ ” Manfred said.
From the A’s perspective, future redevelopment of the Coliseum site would help provide revenue that should make a privately financed Howard Terminal ballpark and surrounding development more economically viable. More exact parameters of the development could take shape over time, but the A’s have released a broad vision that includes tearing down the Coliseum, retaining Oakland Arena (formerly Oracle Arena) as an event venue, and redeveloping the surrounding the land with mixed-use amenities.
In its lawsuit, the city–which jointly owns the Coliseum site with the county– is seeking an injunction that would stop the sale from proceeding and force negotiations between the city and the county. An Alameda County Superior Court judge issued a temporary restraining order on the sale Tuesday while scheduling a November 14 hearing for the case, according to the Chronicle.
RELATED STORIES: Oakland Sues Alameda County Over Potential Coliseum Land Sale; Howard Terminal Ballpark Bill Advances; Oakland, Alameda Sparring Over Potential Coliseum Land Sale; Oakland Balks Over Potential Sale of Coliseum Land to A’s; A’s Howard Terminal Pitch Draws Opposition from Port Stakeholders; Transit Central to Howard Terminal Ballpark Planning; City Council Backs Two State Bills for A’s Howard Terminal Ballpark; Oakland City Council: We Won’t be Rushed on Howard Terminal Decision; Economic Benefits of New Oakland Athletics Waterfront Ballpark: $7.3B; A’s Ballpark Bill Clears State Assembly; A’s Tentative Howard Terminal Agreement Approved; A’s Set for Crucial Howard Terminal Vote; A’s Nearing Vote on Tentative Term Sheet for Howard Terminal; Alameda County Moves Forward With A’s Coliseum Sale; Bill Supporting Howard Terminal Ballpark Advances; A’s Reach Tentative Deal to Purchase County’s Share of Coliseum Site; Maritime Industry Balks at A’s Howard Terminal Ballpark Plan; Traffic, Pollution Emerging as Biggest A’s Ballpark Challenges; Housing a Major Component of A’s Ballpark Proposal; A’s Adjust Howard Terminal Ballpark Design; A’s Partner With Environmental Justice Group as Howard Terminal Talks Continue; Manfred Expresses Optimism About A’s Howard Terminal Pitch; Groups Opposing A’s Howard Terminal Plan; Howard Terminal’s History Could Complicate A’s Ballpark Pitch; Study: Oakland Gondola Would Provide Economic Benefits; A’s Propose Howard Terminal Ballpark, Coliseum Redevelopment; A’s: We’re Track to Announce Ballpark Plan by Year’s End; Potential New A’s Ballpark Backed in Poll; Bill Related to New Oakland A’s Ballpark Signed Into Law; Legislature Approves Bills Related to New Oakland A’s Ballpark; Bjarke Ingels Group to Design New Oakland A’s Ballpark; Oakland A’s Enter Coliseum Negotiations; A’s Howard Terminal Vote Set for Thursday; Alameda County, Oakland to Negotiate Coliseum Site Ownership; Oakland Coliseum Site Now a Hot Property; Oakland Mayor Backs Negotiation Window with A’s; Oakland A’s Make Offer for Coliseum Site; A’s Still Considering Coliseum Site for New Ballpark; Oakland Seeks Full Ownership of Oakland Coliseum Complex