Top Menu

Bill Related to New Oakland A’s Ballpark Signed into Law

Oakland A's

Over the weekend, California governor Jerry Brown signed into law a bill that allows the Oakland A’s to receive an expedited judicial review process if a Howard Terminal ballpark project faces a legal challenge over environmental concerns. 

The A’s are in the process of evaluating their site options for a new ballpark, including the waterfront Howard Terminal and the Oakland Alameda-County Coliseum property. The team has not made a final decision, but the bill signed into law by Brown on Sunday could help it if it moves forward with a Howard Terminal ballpark.

Under the terms of the bill, any legal challenge against the A’s over environmental concerns from a new ballpark project would have to be resolved within 270 days. As noted, the team has not made a final decision on a prospective ballpark site, but the bill has particular implications for Howard Terminal. While the Coliseum has already been subjected to thorough environmental testing, Howard Terminal will require a full environmental impact report under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If a proposal at Howard Terminal were to be met with a legal challenge, this legislation would mandate a faster resolution. That is why ballpark proponents were hoping that this legislation would be signed into law, as the A’s are working to open the new facility in time for the 2023 season. More from the San Francisco Chronicle:

“Not only does this bill help keep the A’s rooted in Oakland, it’s a ‘W’ for local workers, affordable housing and the environment,” Mayor Libby Schaaf said in a statement. “I will continue to work with the A’s to build a ballpark that’s responsible to our taxpayers and enhances neighborhood vitality — whether that neighborhood is at Howard Terminal or the Coliseum.”

Team President Dave Kaval said the law ensures that a ballpark would be ready for a 2023 opening. For now, the A’s are working out economic terms of potential land deals at the two sites, he said.

“We’ve been really pleased, especially with the port and their staff,” he said recently.

The Sierra Club and Judicial Council of California — the policy-making arm of the state court system — both opposed the legislation.

It should be noted that approval of such legislation is not uncommon for certain development projects in California, including new professional sports facilities. The A’s have been working for years to replace the Coliseum, with their current efforts focused on constructing a replacement ballpark in Oakland.

RELATED STORIES: Legislature Approves Bills Related to New Oakland A’s BallparkBjarke Ingels Group to Design New Oakland A’s BallparkOakland A’s Enter Coliseum NegotiationsA’s Howard Terminal Vote Set for ThursdayAlameda County, Oakland to Negotiate Coliseum Site OwnershipOakland Coliseum Site Now a Hot PropertyOakland Mayor Backs Negotiation Window with A’sOakland A’s Make Offer for Coliseum SiteA’s Still Considering Coliseum Site for New BallparkOakland Seeks Full Ownership of Oakland Coliseum ComplexA’s Continue to Pursue New Ballpark in OaklandNew Oakland Athletics Ballpark Plan B Is In The WorksOakland A’s Returning to Three Ballpark SitesBest of 2017, #5: Oakland A’s Ballpark SearchWhat’s Next for a New A’s Ballpark? Four Potential ResolutionsPeralta Community College District to End A’s Ballpark TalksPoll Shows Support for New Oakland A’s BallparkBusiness Leaders Show Support for A’s Ballpark ProposalA’s Preferred Ballpark Site Draws Some ConcernsAthletics Pick Laney College Site for New Privately Financed BallparkConcerns Raised Over Potential A’s Ballpark at Peralta SiteIs Howard Terminal Out as A’s Ballpark Site?Chancellor Intrigued by A’s Ballpark at Laney CollegeBeane: New Ballpark Could Help A’s Keep PlayersReport: A’s Interested in Site Near Laney CollegeOakland A’s Considering Ballpark SitesA’s Hope to Reveal Ballpark Site By Year’s EndBest of 2016, #7: Oakland A’s Ballpark Quest

, , , , , ,