Oakland City Council members indicate they will take their time considering a proposed Oakland A’s ballpark at Howard Terminal, pointing to several questions that need to be answered.
The A’s have proposed a new ballpark at the Port of Oakland’s Howard Terminal, with the facility to anchor a larger development initiative at the site that will include housing and other amenities. Since being unveiled by the franchise in November, the proposal has made progress politically, but it still has to gain city council approvals before moving forward.
Thus far, the A’s have maintained that the ballpark and mixed-use development–including development at Howard Terminal and the RingCentral Coliseum site–will be privately financed, but there are still unanswered questions relating to infrastructure. In addition, some councilmembers want a clearer sense of how any transportation issues at the Howard Terminal site will be addressed. City council hearings on a pair of state bills to support the Howard Terminal project–including one that would streamline the permitting process, and another that allows for the creation of a special taxing district around the ballpark to finance infrastructure–start Wednesday, and are part of a longer vetting process for city officials. More from the San Francisco Chronicle:
“One of the biggest questions people have is transportation,” [Councilman Dan] Kalb said. “How are people going to get to and from the ballpark? We’ve all heard about the plan for an overhead gondola from downtown. That’s an interesting idea, but we need to see a much more comprehensive plan.”
Another big question is who will pay for the roads, walkways, sewer lines and other support structures needed for the privately financed development to pencil out.
So far the team has been tight-lipped.
“We are working with the city on the infrastructure plan,” team spokeswoman Catherine Aker said.
The A’s have been hoping to get final approvals for Howard Terminal by the end of next year, positioning the ballpark for a 2023 opening, but whether that is achievable remains to be seen. In addition, the A’s are proposing to redevelop the Coliseum site. The project would include an amphitheater to replace the Coliseum, new construction in the existing parking lots, and would call for leaving Oracle Arena open for a variety of events.
RELATED STORIES: Economic Benefits of New Oakland Athletics Waterfront Ballpark: $7.3B; A’s Ballpark Bill Clears State Assembly; A’s Tentative Howard Terminal Agreement Approved; A’s Set for Crucial Howard Terminal Vote; A’s Nearing Vote on Tentative Term Sheet for Howard Terminal; Alameda County Moves Forward With A’s Coliseum Sale; Bill Supporting Howard Terminal Ballpark Advances; A’s Reach Tentative Deal to Purchase County’s Share of Coliseum Site; Maritime Industry Balks at A’s Howard Terminal Ballpark Plan; Traffic, Pollution Emerging as Biggest A’s Ballpark Challenges; Housing a Major Component of A’s Ballpark Proposal; A’s Adjust Howard Terminal Ballpark Design; A’s Partner With Environmental Justice Group as Howard Terminal Talks Continue; Manfred Expresses Optimism About A’s Howard Terminal Pitch; Groups Opposing A’s Howard Terminal Plan; Howard Terminal’s History Could Complicate A’s Ballpark Pitch; Study: Oakland Gondola Would Provide Economic Benefits; A’s Propose Howard Terminal Ballpark, Coliseum Redevelopment; A’s: We’re Track to Announce Ballpark Plan by Year’s End; Potential New A’s Ballpark Backed in Poll; Bill Related to New Oakland A’s Ballpark Signed Into Law; Legislature Approves Bills Related to New Oakland A’s Ballpark; Bjarke Ingels Group to Design New Oakland A’s Ballpark; Oakland A’s Enter Coliseum Negotiations; A’s Howard Terminal Vote Set for Thursday; Alameda County, Oakland to Negotiate Coliseum Site Ownership; Oakland Coliseum Site Now a Hot Property; Oakland Mayor Backs Negotiation Window with A’s; Oakland A’s Make Offer for Coliseum Site; A’s Still Considering Coliseum Site for New Ballpark; Oakland Seeks Full Ownership of Oakland Coliseum Complex