More talk, but at least both sides say it was productive: Richmond officials and the braintrust from the Richmond Flying Squirrels (Class AA; Eastern League) had what was described by both sides as a productive discussion of a new ballpark.
The meeting, held last Friday, hashed out the issues facing the team in its pursuit of a facility to replace the deteriorating Diamond. And while no agreement was reached on location (downtown vs. the existing Diamond site), funding or timing, it looks like the beginnings of a game plan are in place. From the Richmond Times-Dispatch’s John O’Connor:
“The pros and cons of all of the sites were really discussed in great detail, the greatest detail we’ve ever discussed the pros on cons of every site, and I think a lot of things came to light,” said [Flying Squirrels chief executive manager Chuck] Domino. “That all goes into the decision-making process, and I think it was a very worthwhile conversation to have….
“Both sides left feeling that we both know what the next steps are, and we’ll both report back to each other when we have those steps done,” Domino said. He chose not to define what the “next steps” are.
According to [mayoral press secretary Tammy] Hawley, “From the city’s perspective, there are many moving parts and stakeholders. There are numerous steps to be taken, especially involving City Council, before anything tangible can move forward.”
We’ve heard rumblings before this meeting that progress was being made on the issue. The Flying Squirrels franchise was moved to Richmond with the explicit understanding that a new ballpark would be in the offing, but so far both Doug Wilder and Dwight Jones have failed to put together a deal.
RELATED STORIES: MiLB squirrelly about new Richmond ballpark; Flying Squirrels: New ballpark still a priority; Flying Squirrels extend Diamond lease, setting stage for ballpark improvements; Experts: Downtown ballpark could revitalize Richmond; Squirrels: No plans to leave Richmond “at the present time”; Didn’t take long: Opposition rises to Richmond Shockoe Bottom ballpark site; Richmond ballpark discussion shifts back to Shockoe Bottom; Manchester in play as well; Richmond: Yes, we really do intend on building a new ballpark; Budget issues postpone Squirrels ballpark to 2015 at the earliest; New Richmond ballpark by 2014?; DiBella: Time to start talking new ballpark; Flying Squirrels throw out first offer on new ballpark; Baseball returns to Richmond’s Diamond — but for how long?; Baseball returns to Richmond tonight; Flying Squirrels unveil uniform designs; Flying Squirrels unveil logo, color schemes; Richmond contest yields another dreadful name; Five finalists for Richmond team name announced; It’s official: Defenders to Richmond; Key decisions due on Connecticut/Richmond move this week; DiBella to keep Defenders, move team to Richmond;Opening Day Partners, HNTB propose radical overhaul of Richmond’s Diamond; Sale of Connecticut Defenders scrapped; New Richmond ballpark can’t happen without city assistance: consultants; Community support lacking for Richmond ballpark proposal; MiLB: New ballpark still preferred route in Richmond; Bostic: It makes no sense to renovate The Diamond; Richmond baseball study didn’t consider renovated Diamond, stacks deck for new downtown ballpark; Richmond ballpark consulting deal draws criticism; Norwich approves Defenders lease transfer; Richmond to study new ballpark; Defenders ballpark lease transfer on tap for next week; new team for Norwich chosen?; Renovated Diamond may do in Richmond; MiLB to Richmond: Show us the ballpark plan; Richmond group applies for permission to buy team; New Richmond ballpark would rely on sales-tax rebates; Richmond group says it’s close to buying team
Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.