It wouldn’t be a real ballpark if there wasn’t real opposition, as petitions opposing public funding of a new downtown El Paso ballpark are now being circulated.
In fact, we can’t recall any effort for a new ballpark where opponents didn’t organize on some level, whether it be citizens groups going to court to oppose professional baseball (as was the case in San Rafael) or launching petition drives to persuade elected officials to heed their wishes (as was the case in Wilmington, N.C.). So seeing a petition drive emerge in El Paso is hardly unique.
The arguments raised by ballpark opponents are fairly standard (lacking a NIMBY angle, as the ballpark is slated for downtown El Paso): the ballpark-financing deal was made in secret (as are all real-estate transactions in every major city); the existing ballpark is good enough (no, it’s utterly untrue Cohen Stadium meets Triple-A specs or could easily be renovated to meet them); El Paso is smaller than Tucson, and baseball has issues there (apples vs. oranges arguments and totally misleading — Triple-A thrives in markets smaller than El Paso, such as Des Moines and Reno); and the issue should be put before voters (totally valid).
It’s not clear how effective a petition drive will be: there’s no mechanism to force a referendum question on the fall ballot, and absent an utterly resounding number of signatures — like a quarter million or so — it’s hard to see how this drive could have much of an impact.
Under a ballpark plan passed by the city, a new $50-million ballpark could open for the 2014 season, with a local group purchasing the Tucson Padres (Class AAA; Pacific Coast League).
RELATED STORIES: Hoteliers: We don’t want to pay for new El Paso ballpark; El Paso group: we’re one step closer to buying PCL team; Pacific Coast League expected to decide El Paso bid for baseball this week; El Paso: Let’s sell Cohen Stadium to Tigua tribe; T-Padres back in Kino Stadium for 2013; One side effect of new El Paso ballpark: return of UTEP baseball; El Paso ownership group pitches PCL; El Paso approves ballpark for Triple-A team; First look: El Paso ballpark renderings; Diablos casualty of new El Paso ballpark; Downtown ballpark planning moving forward in El Paso; El Paso to debate ballpark bond issue; El Paso group seeking downtown ballpark, T-Pads; Moorad to Escondido: We need quick action on ballpark; Obstacles to new ballparks in California: not as bleak as expected; Escondido moving forward with business park on proposed ballpark property; City, not Moorad group, to acquire Escondido land; Escondido mayor: Time to scrap new-ballpark plan; Moorad: Leaving Padres in Tucson a possibility; Escondido ballpark vote put off indefinitely; Escondido ballpark vote delayed;State government could kill Escondido T-Pods ballpark; New for 2011: Tucson Padres;Escondido approves Triple-A ballpark — with reservations; Moorad group, Escondido sign MOU for new ballpark; Escondido council fills vacancy in advance of ballpark vote; Crunch time for new Escondido ballpark; Padres raise ante in Escondido ballpark negotiations; Escondido ballpark vote delayed again; new council will decide; Padres make it official: Beavers to Tucson in 2011; Election shows mixed support for new Escondido ballpark; Tuesday elections could determine fate of Bevos; Bevos to Tucson for 2011; Escondido ballpark vote delayed after pollution found at site; Fate of Bevos in the air until November, maybe December; Padres pitch one-sided lease to Escondido; Escondido: Show us some money, Padres; Escondido in, San Marcos out of Bevos ballpark mix