Top Menu

Moorad to Escondido: We need quick deal on ballpark

Tucson PadresBecause he may conditionally sell the Tucson Padres (Class AAA; Pacific Coast League), owner Jeff Moorad is demanding a commitment from Escondido to build a $50M ballpark — with no funding assured.

As you’ll recall, the city backed away from the idea of public financing of a new ballpark for Moorad, also the owner of the San Diego Padres, until it was assured community-redevelopment funds would be available. In his last state budget, Gov. Jerry Brown laid claim to a good chunk of money available to city and county redevelopment agencies, including Escondido’s. Brown’s actions led to a lawsuit from the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association, claiming they were unconstitutional. That lawsuit is expected to be decided by the California Supreme Court by Jan. 15, 2012.

Which is why Escondido officials were taking a wait-and-see attitude toward funding of the ballpark. Besides, even with redevelopment money available, a new Escondido ballpark is far from a slam-dunk; there’s potential pollution problems with the site, and Escondido has already committed redevelopment monies for several years into the future. Besides, even if Brown’s act is overturned, it may not be overturned all the way, leaving the city with some, but not all, of its expected future redevelopment funds.

So it’s a little surprising Moorad is demanding a commitment. The potential deal, as described in the North County Times, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to us. Moorad wants a deal now to give himself an out during the process of selling the team. It’s pretty clear Moorad doesn’t want to own the team if an Escondido ballpark falls through, and there are buyers out there for a Pacific Coast League team with a short-term lease commitment, a la Tucson. Still, Moorad could easily begin the process of selling the team and place a condition on a potential buyer that he refuses the right to withdraw the team sale if an Escondido ballpark materializes. He doesn’t need an agreement with Escondido to do that.

RELATED STORIES: Obstacles to new ballparks in California: not as bleak as expected; Escondido moving forward with business park on proposed ballpark property; City, not Moorad group, to acquire Escondido land; Escondido mayor: Time to scrap new-ballpark plan; Moorad: Leaving Padres in Tucson a possibility; Escondido ballpark vote put off indefinitely; Escondido ballpark vote delayed; State government could kill Escondido T-Pods ballpark; New for 2011: Tucson Padres; Escondido approves Triple-A ballpark — with reservations; Moorad group, Escondido sign MOU for new ballpark; Escondido council fills vacancy in advance of ballpark vote; Crunch time for new Escondido ballpark; Padres raise ante in Escondido ballpark negotiations; Escondido ballpark vote delayed again; new council will decide; Padres make it official: Beavers to Tucson in 2011; Election shows mixed support for new Escondido ballpark; Tuesday elections could determine fate of Bevos; Bevos to Tucson for 2011; Escondido ballpark vote delayed after pollution found at site; Fate of Bevos in the air until November, maybe December; Padres pitch one-sided lease to Escondido; Escondido: Show us some money, Padres; Escondido in, San Marcos out of Bevos ballpark mix


Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at

Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.

Join Ballpark Digest on Facebook and on Twitter!

, , , , , , , , ,