The Diamondbacks, backed up by MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred, say Maricopa County has failed to perform contractually obligated maintenance at Chase Field and seeking to break the current lease. Of course, it’s more complicated than this brief summary, but you get the idea.
The two sides could not even agree on how to handle the airing of their grievances: the Diamondbacks were going for a court trial, but the county argued the lease mandated arbitration — a cheaper and potentially quicker way of settling differences. Judge Karen Mullins sided with the court and ordered arbitration to be completed before the end of the year. From the Arizona Republic:
“Resolving this dispute through arbitration is better for the taxpayers, rather than using expensive litigation,” Grady Gammage, an attorney representing the county stadium district, said in a written statement.
“The Court did a complete review of the contract between the Diamondbacks and the County Stadium District and the ruling is a thorough analysis of the arbitration provisions,” he said.
County officials also noted that Mullins wrote that the team is “obligated under the (agreements) to play all games at the Ballpark. Allowing the team to pursue alternative options or partnerships does not preserve the status quo of that obligation.”
RELATED STORIES: Maricopa County/Diamondbacks Spat Continues; Rob Manfred: Chase Field Needs Work; Maricopa County Files to Dismiss D-Backs Lawsuit; D-Backs Sue Over Chase Field Agreement; Chase Field Sale Scratched; Chase Field Could be Replaced; Deadline Extended for Chase Field Sale; 2010 Appraisal: Chase Field Worth $45 Million; Will D-Backs Exercise Veto Over Chase Field Sale?; Maricopa County Debates Sale of Chase Field to Investors; Drama in the Desert; Diamondbacks: Improve Chase Field or We Will Leave