Top Menu

San Jose to fund Municipal Stadium repairs

San Jose Municipal Stadium

An attempt to hold up routine maintenance on Municipal Stadium, home of the San Jose Giants (High Class A; California League), as a proxy battle against the San Francisco Giants failed today.

The routine maintenance, slated to cost $85,000, would improve field drainage and add striping to the parking lot, among other things, per the team’s lease. 

The fact that the maintenance would benefit the San Jose Giants — largely owned and operated by parent San Francisco Giants — meant the expenditure became a proxy for the larger battle between the Oakland Athletics and the Giants over Silicon Valley. The Giants have blocked a move by A’s owner Lew Wolff to build a new ballpark in downtown San Jose, and some of the members of the City Council — most notably Mayor Chuck Reed and councilmember Sam Liccardo — have worked closely with the A’s on the ballpark plan. Adding to the bad feelings: both Giants teams have help fund a citizens group opposing the new ballpark on environmental grounds.

The rest of the city council, however, rejected the proxy battle on an 8-3 vote, clearing the way for the routine maintenance. Some council members even went to the point of saying they foresaw a future where both the A’s and the San Jose Giants played in the city, and they didn’t want to harm the ballpark by withholding maintenance funds. Still, the issue won’t go away, but it looks as though it will shift to next year, when the Giants’ lease at Municipal Stadium is up.

Image of San Jose Municipal Stadium by John Moist.

RELATED STORIES: San Jose: Why are we being so friendly to the Giants?Giants: Nothing would tempt us to give up Silicon Valley territorySelig: A’s can leave Oakland — just not for San JoseCal to San Jose: Slow down on new ballparkA’s expected to push for ballpark decision at owner’s meetingsToday’s A’s/Giants update: nothing newWolff: A’s aren’t for saleSuitors emerge for Oakland AthleticsTurf wars rage again in Bay Area: A’s say San Jose move doesn’t infringe on GiantsOakland: One last gasp at keeping A’sMLB: No, there’s been no decision on Oakland A’s to San JoseOakland bows out of Victory Court site for new A’s ballparkCourt ruling clarifies San Jose, Escondido ballpark statusesSan Jose to sell A’s ballpark land at huge lossOakland player plan depends on new ballparkObstacles to new ballparks in California: not as bleak as expectedSan Jose rushing to acquire land for Athletics ballparkCould Oakland bar A’s from moving?Cal budget issues could alter San Jose, Oakland plans for A’s ballparkBeware folks peddling simple solutions to complex problemsOakland moves forward on environmental study of A’s ballpark siteOakland may be in better financial shape to host new A’s ballparkOakland pitches new waterfront site for new A’s ballparkAs Giants win World Series, Athletics ballpark status in limbo


Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at

Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.

Join Ballpark Digest on Facebook and on Twitter!

Follow Ballpark Digest on Google + and add us to your circles!

, , , , , , , ,