In an effort to turn out support for public funding of a new Chicago Cubs spring-training complex in northwest Mesa, the city and the team released renderings of a lovely new facility, complete with retail, iconic sign a la Wrigley and office space.
Mesa voters will have before them two referendum questions on Nov. 2 related to a new Chicago Cubs: the first (Proposition 420 — enter your own pot joke here) will allow the city to spend more than $1.5 million on a sports facility, while the second would raise the city’s hotel tax to potentially help play for the complex. The city is also selling land in Pinal County to help pay for the project.
Which now has a new price tag: $84 million for the development and $15 million for infrastructure work. Mesa’s exposure is capped at this level: if there are additional costs incurred, then the Cubs will pay. The new complex would open in 2013.
The Cubs and Mesa have described the lease as running 30 years, but that’s not quite right: it’s a 25-year lease with two five-year options, and the Cubs can leave after 20 with a buyout, as spelled out in the current Memo of Understanding between the team and Mesa. It is quite the doozy: Mesa pays for everything (including water and trash service; the Cubs will pay for electricity) and receives literally no revenue from the project past normal sales-tax revenues. The Cubs retain everything, including naming rights, suite revenues, concessions and parking revenues.
Which, apparently, was the price for keeping the Cubs in Mesa.
Renderings courtesy of Keep the Cubs.
RELATED STORIES: Riverside Park emerges as choice for Cubs spring-training facilities; Study evaluates potential Cubs spring-training sites ; Five sites emerge as home for new Cubs facility; Cubs to Naples: We prefer to stay in Arizona, thank you; Florida group to Cubs: Tell us if we’re really in the running to land spring training; Naples: We think we still have shot at landing Cubs spring training; Cubs, Mesa working on new spring-ballpark agreement; Mesa: We’ll finance Cubs ballpark on our own; State funding for Cubs spring facility “dead”; Florida explores new money for luring Cactus League teams; Selig pushes Cubs aside, will directly negotiate funding of new spring venue; Legislators: Yup, we want Cactus League ticket tax; Cubs: We’re not wedded to idea of Cactus League ticket tax; Cactus League teams, Selig oppose Cubs spring-training funding; Mesa to ask for state aid to keep Cubs; Cubs seriously looking at Naples spring-training bid; Naples: We’re serious about landing the Cubs; Ricketts to visit Mesa next week to tour potential spring-training sites; Lawmaker: Florida should up spending to lure spring camps for Cubs, Brewers; Cubs’ spring-training future doesn’t lie in HoHoKam Park; Mesa delegation to pitch Cubs on spring-training facilities
Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribers to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter see features before they’re posted to the site. You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.
Join Ballpark Digest on Facebook and on Twitter!