No wonder talks over the future of the Tampa Bay Rays stalled: St. Pete officials say the team refuses to pay anything toward retirement of debt or a future demolition of Tropicana Field.
Now, it’s defensible that the Rays pass on paying to demolish the Trop down the road: that’s the responsibility of the owner (in this case, St. Pete), and we don’t know of a case where a sports tenant helped pay for the demolition of a facility once the lease expired. And the city is also asking for a yearly payment through 2027, whether or not the Trop is standing. Again, the Rays’ opposition to this is defensible.
But the core of the city’s plan — that the Rays help pay off existing debt on Tropicana Field — is defensible if it’s tied to an early end to the lease. (We suspect the city isn’t putting it in these terms, however). But in some ways these talks are premature. The city will certainly make money by selling or leasing the land under Tropicana Field to a developer: despite the failure of the ballpark, the location is still a prime one, right off the freeway with lots of visibility and easy accessibility. It’s perfect as the gateway to downtown St. Pete. Any sale would more than cover the cost of demolishing the Trop.
Without knowing exactly what the city wants, it’s hard to say if the Rays are being reasonable or not. But city officials certainly seem upset about the way the tenor of talks changed after Bud Selig became involved: before that, they say, Rays officials were interested in coming up with a solution, and now they’re absolutists about not paying a penny in exchange for a release from the Trop lease. From the Tampa Tribune:
City Council members on Thursday blamed Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig for the impasse, saying he is behind the Rays’ negotiating position.
The Rays’ negotiating position is a slap in the face for the city and Pinellas County residents who have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in developing and subsidizing Tropicana Field, City Council Chairman Karl Nurse said.
“Their premise is they shouldn’t have to pay us anything,” he said. “I can’t imagine how they can say, ‘We owe you nothing. Goodbye.’ And I can’t imagine the city agreeing to that.”
On the other hand, the protests from St. Pete officials are a little hard to take: MLB officials love to negotiate, and a logical opening stance in negotiations like this would call for no payments at all. Asking for the moon and then being rebuffed is no reason for elected officials to run to the fainting couch with the vapors. We’re guessing that at the end of the day the Rays will contribute something toward paying down ballpark debt, but only after St. Pete comes up with a realistic plan for redevelopment of the site.
RELATED STORIES: St. Pete mayor: Talks with Rays going poorly; Poll: little support for public funding of new Rays ballpark; Feeding frenzy begins on siting potential Rays ballpark; Selig: Time to resolve Tama Bay Rays ballpark situation; Negotiations begin: Tampa asks for at least $200M from Rays for new ballpark; Hillsborough County ready to talk new Rays ballpark; Sternberg: No plan to move Rays; Downtown tax for new Rays ballpark looking iffy; Sternberg: MLB doesn’t believe in Tampa Bay; Rays ballpark plan at Carillon Business Park withdrawn by developer; Study: New Rays ballpark shouldn’t require new taxes; Poll: St. Pete voters opposed to public financing of new ballpark; Foster: We won’t allow Rays to talk new ballpark in Tampa; Experts: St. Petersburg should worry about making Rays deal now, not damages down the road; St. Pete ratchets up legal threats over new Rays ballpark; Is a business park the best place for a Rays ballpark?; More land assembled for new Rays ballpark?; Rays propose ballpark talks after Trop situation worked out; Abundance of riches: Another new ballpark pitched for Rays; LeClair unveils intriguing ballpark plan for Rays; Rays: We’ll listen to St. Pete ballpark pitch; Letter: Rays can talk new ballpark — but only for St. Pete location; Ballpark pitch will be heard by St. Pete — but officials will not respond; Parking huge issue for proposed Rays ballpark site; Pinellas County, private investor want to pitch Rays, St. Pete on ballpark plan; Rays: We’ll talk new ballpark with Hillsborough County; Hillsborough County: Nothing legally bars us from talking new ballpark with Rays; Newly available land parcel could bring downtown Tampa ballpark — maybe; Immigration funds eyed for new Rays ballpark; Oakland contemplates foreign investments to help fund A’s ballpark; Hillsborough County ready to make run at new Rays ballpark; Rays: Prove to us Tampa Bay can support baseball; Could this be the year for a new Rays ballpark?; Regional ballpark authority pitched for Tampa Bay; Mayor, council differ on approach to Rays ballpark issue; Tampa: We could have $100M for new Rays ballpark
Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.
Join Ballpark Digest on Facebook and on Twitter!
Follow Ballpark Digest on Google + and add us to your circles!