With St. Petersburg Mayor Bill Foster finally facing reality and softening his stance on a move of the Tampa Bay Rays, Tampa officials are already prepping a game plan to lure the franchise across the bay.
In the middle of a tough reelection campaign, the hardnosed Foster — who has insisted from Day One that the Rays serve out the remainder of their Tropicana Field lease no matter the financial costs — has backed off that stance. Earlier this week he said it would be better for the Rays to stay somewhere in greater Tampa Bay rather than leaving the market in the face of poor attendance, and yesterday he affirmed the change in opinion:
“My position hasn’t changed in protecting and preserving the interests of the taxpayers,” Foster said Tuesday. “The objective is to keep the Rays in Tampa Bay for generations to come and the only way we get to have those discussions would be to allow exploration throughout the region.”
Enter Tampa, where there’s been talk of downtown ballpark sites and potential funding sources (like an extension of an existing downtown tax) for months now. Hillsborough County Commission Chairman Ken Hagan has been an advocate of bringing in the Rays, and with the new that Foster is backing down, he’s sprung into action and is already forming a committee with Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn to meet with the Rays ownership:
It initially would sit down with Rays executives and ask them about future plans and needs, but future discussions could include possible sites around Tampa and Hillsborough County. Private landowners who might want to develop a stadium on their property would not have seats on the committee, Hagan said.
Other leaders on the Hillsborough side of the bay have less formulated plans than Hagan, but sounded thrilled that Foster has softened his hard-line stance toward the Rays.
“We think it was a great move in making sure the Tampa Bay Rays remain the Tampa Bay Rays,” said Bob Rohrlack, chief executive of the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce.
Buckhorn provided his own enthusiasm in a statement issued by his office:
“It is time we broke the stalemate, and I look forward to the opportunity for the Rays to explore all options,” Buckhorn said in the statement. “Commissioner Hagan and I have agreed throughout this process that the most important thing is for them to stay in Tampa Bay. I believe an agreement reached sooner rather than later will ensure their continued future here.”
Of course, there are many issues to be addressed, like buying out the Trop lease, the future of the ballpark and how a new ballpark would be financed. Still, Foster’s change of heart is a major hurdle that’s been overcome.
RELATED STORIES: Hillsborough County ready to talk new Rays ballpark; Sternberg: No plan to move Rays; Downtown tax for new Rays ballpark looking iffy; Sternberg: MLB doesn’t believe in Tampa Bay; Rays ballpark plan at Carillon Business Park withdrawn by developer; Study: New Rays ballpark shouldn’t require new taxes; Poll: St. Pete voters opposed to public financing of new ballpark; Foster: We won’t allow Rays to talk new ballpark in Tampa; Experts: St. Petersburg should worry about making Rays deal now, not damages down the road; St. Pete ratchets up legal threats over new Rays ballpark; Is a business park the best place for a Rays ballpark?; More land assembled for new Rays ballpark?; Rays propose ballpark talks after Trop situation worked out; Abundance of riches: Another new ballpark pitched for Rays; LeClair unveils intriguing ballpark plan for Rays; Rays: We’ll listen to St. Pete ballpark pitch; Letter: Rays can talk new ballpark — but only for St. Pete location; Ballpark pitch will be heard by St. Pete — but officials will not respond; Parking huge issue for proposed Rays ballpark site; Pinellas County, private investor want to pitch Rays, St. Pete on ballpark plan; Rays: We’ll talk new ballpark with Hillsborough County; Hillsborough County: Nothing legally bars us from talking new ballpark with Rays; Newly available land parcel could bring downtown Tampa ballpark — maybe; Immigration funds eyed for new Rays ballpark; Oakland contemplates foreign investments to help fund A’s ballpark; Hillsborough County ready to make run at new Rays ballpark; Rays: Prove to us Tampa Bay can support baseball; Could this be the year for a new Rays ballpark?; Regional ballpark authority pitched for Tampa Bay; Mayor, council differ on approach to Rays ballpark issue; Tampa: We could have $100M for new Rays ballpark; Yet another group seeks to break Rays ballpark logjam; St. Pete mayor: there’s nothing wrong with the Trop; Tampa, St. Pete business leaders combine forces for new Rays ballpark; Could Rays declare bankruptcy to escape Trop lease?; Tampa Sports Authority declines to participate in Rays ballpark talks — for now; Chamber to take up Rays ballpark cause; Pinellas County extends hotel tax — but not enough for new Rays ballpark; Selig still “concerned” about Rays ballpark situation; Pinellas County mulls hotel-tax extension for new Rays ballpark; Rays: No, we’re not interested in limiting ballpark search to St. Pete; Can Tampa Bay support MLB?; St. Pete officials now say Trop is replaceable — at a price; Potential new player emerges in Rays ballpark battle; Rays: Time to talk new ballpark again; Rays ballpark brawl: Tampa versus St. Pete; Three Rays ballpark sites recommended by committee; New Rays ballpark discussion shifts to Tampa;Group: Any new Rays ballpark needs retractable roof; Group: Renovating Trop isn’t option in keeping Rays; Rays task force may have prelim recommendations by June — but no site
Share your news with the baseball community. Send it to us at email@example.com.
Are you a subscriber to the weekly Ballpark Digest newsletter? You can sign up for a free subscription at the Newsletter Signup Page.